Add this to the heaping mountain of evidence against the Government controlling anything:
In Network World magazine issue May 4th, 2009 (hardly the political rag), Johna Till Johnson writes “Of subways, gov’t subsidies and broadband“. She begins with a question posed, by implication, from a friend of hers:
“Governments do a good job running subways — so why not the Internet”
Johna opens the pages of history showing that the New York City public transportation systems began as private enterprises operating for profit.
There were three independent companies competing for fares and riders.
Innovation and growth were paramount and service was excellent.
The entire system was flash-frozen, as it were, by the stock market crash of 1929. The for-profit systems went bankrupt and the city bought them all out.
The subway map circa 2009 is extremely similar to the subway map of 1924.
Since the government takeover, without competition, innovation and growth haven’t occured. At all.
(M)illions of folks who live and work in New York have had access to a more-or-less reliable, more-or-less affordable form of transportation for the past 80 years.
But prices have risen, ridership has stagnated, and there is no such thing as a realistic or even probable plan for further development.
Johna is talking about the government taking over the internet:
Sanford-Bernstein’s Craig Moffatt’s conclusion? “Broadband is today’s transportation grid. … The story of the subways highlights the fundamental trade-offs between competition – and its inherent sloppiness and redundancy – and nationalization (or, in this case, municipalization), with its inherent stagnation.”
But what about medicine and healthcare? With the government controlling all healthcare costs, it will control all medicine, period.
The greatest strength in American medicine is it’s relentless and constant innovation.
With government control we may have relatively reliable (or at least an expected level of non-service) medical care for existing conditions.
But what about future conditions?
What about the disease little Johnny is supposed to find the cure for in 50 years?
With government control the urge to control all but the corrupted costs will be as relentless as the innovation is today, and Johnny will be told his medical research isn’t cost-effective.
And the conditions we currently consider untreatable but with promising new developments may soon be, will be simply: untreatable.
Government does not fix things, it breaks things.
Government doesn’t innovate, it retrogrades.
Government doesn’t manage, it controls.
Nothing government controls ever flourishes, besides itself.