<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-Introducing Relativism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipandora.net/2008/06/24/re-introducing-relativism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipandora.net/2008/06/24/re-introducing-relativism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JPennStar</title>
		<link>http://www.ipandora.net/2008/06/24/re-introducing-relativism/#comment-8153</link>
		<dc:creator>JPennStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipandora.net/?p=652#comment-8153</guid>
		<description>I like David Limbaugh, more so than his brother, but (yup) here again I really don't see much content. There is a lot of general ideas, ad homs, joking, contrasting, etc, but where are the facts and first source material?

I've been getting on an American history kick and I can't stand reading other's opinions and thoughts. They bore me! I want original source material which allows me to make my own judgement. For example, while at Borders I found a book titled, The Federalist Papers, which entails the letters from Hamilton, Madison and John Jay to the colonies ensuring them the Constitution will guarentee the states their freedom and also that is it superior to the Articles of Confederation. I loved reading this!

So when I read anything I ask whether or not this is an original idea/argument, if it is referencing original source material or if it is just vague opinion.

Like I said before the best place to look for this is at www.votesmart.org where you can see Obama's voting record (or the lack thereof).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like David Limbaugh, more so than his brother, but (yup) here again I really don&#8217;t see much content. There is a lot of general ideas, ad homs, joking, contrasting, etc, but where are the facts and first source material?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been getting on an American history kick and I can&#8217;t stand reading other&#8217;s opinions and thoughts. They bore me! I want original source material which allows me to make my own judgement. For example, while at Borders I found a book titled, The Federalist Papers, which entails the letters from Hamilton, Madison and John Jay to the colonies ensuring them the Constitution will guarentee the states their freedom and also that is it superior to the Articles of Confederation. I loved reading this!</p>
<p>So when I read anything I ask whether or not this is an original idea/argument, if it is referencing original source material or if it is just vague opinion.</p>
<p>Like I said before the best place to look for this is at <a href="http://www.votesmart.org">http://www.votesmart.org</a> where you can see Obama&#8217;s voting record (or the lack thereof).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara (Xerraire)</title>
		<link>http://www.ipandora.net/2008/06/24/re-introducing-relativism/#comment-8152</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara (Xerraire)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipandora.net/?p=652#comment-8152</guid>
		<description>I don't think I really want to know the REAL Obama. The one that is parading around is scary enough to me.

We all need reality checks to make sure we are not dealing in relativism for our own egos.

But when the culture is drowning in relativism...
Well, then, they will believe in (and vote for) a lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I really want to know the REAL Obama. The one that is parading around is scary enough to me.</p>
<p>We all need reality checks to make sure we are not dealing in relativism for our own egos.</p>
<p>But when the culture is drowning in relativism&#8230;<br />
Well, then, they will believe in (and vote for) a lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
